You posted the role three weeks ago. Got some decent applications. Scheduled interviews. Had good conversations. Sent the "we'll be in touch" email.
Then nothing.
They stopped responding. Disappeared. Ghosted you mid-process like you're a bad Tinder date.
And now you're sitting there wondering what's wrong with candidates these days. Their work ethic. Their professionalism. Their respect.
Wrong question.
The right question: What does candidate ghosting reveal about your business?
Spoiler: Nothing good.
Here's what you're competing against: Talent shortages. Multiple offers. Companies that figured out speed wins. Candidates who have options and know how to use them.
Your hiring process was built for 2010. It's 2025. The power dynamic flipped and you're still acting like you're doing candidates a favor by considering them.
You're not.

They're interviewing with three of your competitors while you're "still reviewing applications." They're getting offers while you're scheduling round three. They're accepting jobs while you're "circling back next week."
Candidates aren't ghosting you because they're flaky. They're ghosting you because someone else closed them faster.
When candidates disappear, they're sending a message. You're just not listening.
Message One: Your process signals chaos.
Slow communication. Unclear timelines. Disorganized interviews. Changing requirements mid-process. Multiple rounds with no end in sight.
That's not thorough. That's a red flag factory.
Candidates see this and think: If they can't manage a hiring process, what's the actual job going to be like? If leadership can't make a decision on a hire, what else can't they decide?
Message Two: You're moving too slow.
The best candidates are off the market in 7-10 days. Not weeks. Days.
If your process takes three weeks and four rounds of interviews, you're not meeting top talent. You're meeting whoever's still available after everyone else got hired.
Message Three: You're not selling the opportunity.
You're still interviewing like you're the prize. Like candidates should be grateful you're considering them.
In a talent shortage, you're the one selling. Every interaction is a pitch. Every delay is a competitor's opportunity.
If you're not actively closing candidates, someone else is.
Message Four: Your business looks unstable.
Candidates are doing reconnaissance before they apply. Glassdoor reviews. LinkedIn stalking. Checking how long your roles stay open. Asking their network about your reputation.
If they're ghosting mid-process, they found something they didn't like. Maybe it's your cash flow problems showing up in online reviews. Maybe it's the three people who left the role in two years. Maybe it's your website that looks like it hasn't been updated since 2018.
They're making calculated risk assessments. Will this company exist in six months? Will I get paid on time? Is the leadership competent?
If the answer looks like "maybe not," they're out.
Message Five: You're treating them like they owe you something.
They don't.
You're not owed loyalty from candidates. You're not owed their time. You're not owed respect just because you're the employer.
Earn it or lose them.

Most business owners don't know if they're fast or slow because they've never checked. They're just doing what they've always done and hoping it works.
Hope isn't a strategy. Neither is guessing.
Here's how to find out what competitive looks like in your market:
Use Job Boards with Market Data
You're probably already posting on these. Start reading their reports.
Indeed publishes hiring trend reports by industry. Time-to-fill averages. Application-to-hire ratios. They're telling you exactly how fast your competitors are moving.
LinkedIn Talent Insights shows you what's normal in your industry and location. How long roles stay open. How many applicants per role. What competitive looks like.
SEEK (Australia/NZ), Monster (US/Europe), Glassdoor (global) all publish employment market data quarterly. Read it.
These aren't academic papers. They're market intelligence. Use them.
Check Industry-Specific Resources
Your industry has benchmarks. You're just not looking for them.
SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management) tracks hiring metrics across industries.
CIPD (UK/Europe) publishes talent market research.
Josh Bersin runs HR analyst reports that cover global hiring trends.
Your trade association probably tracks hiring data. Check their reports.
If you're in tech, hospitality, healthcare, trades—there's data on what normal looks like. Find it.
Ask Your Recruiter
If you're using a recruiter, they know. They're placing candidates every week. They see what's working and what's dying on the vine.
Ask them: How fast are my competitors moving? What's the average time-to-offer in my industry? Where am I losing candidates?
If they can't answer, get a better recruiter.
Ask Candidates Directly
Stop treating the interview like an interrogation. Make it a conversation.
"How many other opportunities are you looking at?" "What's your timeline for making a decision?" "What's your experience been with other hiring processes?"
They'll tell you. Then you'll know exactly what you're competing against.
LinkedIn Stalking
Check when your competitors post roles. Check when those roles disappear. That's how long it's taking them to fill positions.
If they're posting and filling in two weeks and you're taking six, you've got your answer.
Track Your Own Data
You should know:
Days from first contact to phone screen
Days from phone screen to first interview
Days from first interview to offer
Offer acceptance rate
Where candidates drop out
If you don't track this, start. You can't fix what you don't measure.
The Real Benchmark
Here's the shortcut: If you're taking longer than two weeks from first contact to offer, you're slow.
Not "a little slow." Not "thorough." Slow.
The market moves fast. You need to move faster.
Your hiring process has problems. Here's what to fix.

✓ Speed Up Your Timeline
Three rounds of interviews over four weeks? Dead on arrival.
Streamline to: Phone screen, one in-person interview (maybe two if it's senior leadership), offer. One week. Two max.
If you need six people to meet a candidate, put them all in one room. Or accept that you don't actually need six opinions.
✓ Communicate Like You Mean It
Radio silence between stages isn't professional. It's lazy.
Candidates should hear from you within 24-48 hours at every stage. Not with a decision necessarily. With an update.
"We're moving you forward. You'll hear from us by Friday about next steps."
"We're still interviewing. We'll have a decision by end of week."
"This isn't the right fit. Here's why."
Fast communication signals competence. Silence signals chaos.
✓ Fix Your Job Descriptions
"Competitive salary" means "we're going to lowball you and see if you take it."
"Fast-paced environment" means "we're disorganized and you'll be putting out fires."
"Wear many hats" means "we can't afford to hire properly."
Candidates can read between the lines. Stop being vague.
List the actual salary range. Describe the actual work. Be honest about what's broken that you're hiring to fix.
Clarity wins. Vagueness loses.
✓ Stop the Interview Gauntlet
Meeting with six people across four sessions isn't thorough. It's a signal that no one in your leadership can make a decision.
Streamline. Make a hire/no-hire decision with the minimum number of conversations needed. Probably two meetings. Maybe three for senior roles.
If you need more than that, your problem isn't the candidate. It's your decision-making structure.
✓ Sell the Opportunity
Every interview is a sales conversation. You're selling:
The role (why it matters, what they'll accomplish)
The company (where you're going, why it's stable)
The team (who they'll work with, why that's valuable)
The growth (what's next for them)
If you're not actively closing candidates, they're passively walking away.
✓ Respect Their Time
Asking for spec work, three references before an offer, or a 40-page application for an entry-level role isn't "finding the right fit." It's telling candidates you don't value their time.
They notice. And they leave.

Candidate ghosting isn't just annoying. It's expensive.
Time Cost: Every ghosted candidate is hours of screening, interviewing, and follow-up that went nowhere. Multiply that by every open role. That's weeks of productivity lost.
Opportunity Cost: While you're re-posting roles and starting over, your team is understaffed. Projects are delayed. Clients aren't getting served. Revenue isn't getting generated.
How much is that costing you per week?
Reputation Cost: Candidates talk. They're posting about their experience on Glassdoor, telling their network, warning other job seekers.
A bad hiring process becomes a recruitment barrier. The best candidates won't apply because they've heard you're a mess.
Competitive Cost: Your competitors are hiring the talent you're losing. They're scaling while you're stuck. They're executing while you're re-interviewing.
That gap compounds.
Quality Cost: When you're chronically understaffed because you can't close candidates, you hire whoever's still available. Not the best fit. Not the top performer. Just whoever will say yes.
That's how you end up with mediocre teams. Not because you chose poorly. Because the good ones got away.
The Fix
Update your hiring process to match the market you're actually operating in.
Research what competitive looks like. Track your own data. Move faster. Communicate clearly. Sell the opportunity. Close with confidence.
This isn't about being "candidate-friendly." It's about being competitive.
Your competitors figured this out. They're hiring faster, communicating better, and closing talent while you're still "circling back."
Systems scale. Chaos collapses.
Your hiring process is either a competitive advantage or a bottleneck. Right now, if candidates are ghosting you, it's a bottleneck.
Fix it.
Or keep losing.
Your final destination for ditching the overwhelm and stress of running a business.
Get The BRIEF
Smart plays - straight to your Inbox!