You're doing everything. Sales, delivery, operations, customer service, admin. You're the bottleneck. You know it. Everyone knows it.
So you decide: "I need a manager."
Not yet. You need systems.
But let's say you ignore that and hire anyway. Here's what happens: You hire someone with "Manager" in their title, pay them manager salary, then micromanage them into quitting within six months.
Because you weren't actually ready to hire a manager. You were ready to hire an expensive assistant you could blame when things don't improve.
Let's fix that.
You think you're hiring someone to "take things off your plate." Someone who will "figure it out." Someone who will "manage the day-to-day so you can focus on strategy."
Vague. Useless. Destined to fail.
Here's what you actually think a manager will do:
Read your mind about priorities
Fix all the chaos you created
Make decisions exactly the way you would
Not bother you with questions
Make everything run smoothly without systems, documentation, or clarity
That person doesn't exist.
And if they did, they'd be running their own business, not managing yours.
You're getting someone who walks into chaos with a fancy title and no power.
They ask how things work. You say "we don't really have a process for that."
They suggest changes. You say "we've always done it this way."
They make a decision. You override it because it's not what you would have done.
They try to manage. You micromanage them.
Three months in, they're doing exactly what you tell them to do, exactly how you tell them to do it. That's not management. That's expensive task completion.
Six months in, they quit. You're confused why "management didn't work out."
It didn't work out because you weren't managing. You were controlling.

You say you want to delegate. You don't. Not really.
What you want is a clone who executes perfectly without you having to explain anything or give up any control.
Here's the test: Can this person make decisions without asking you?
If the answer is no, you didn't hire a manager. You hired someone to wait for your approval on everything. That's not delegation. That's bottleneck duplication.
Real delegation means:
They make calls you wouldn't have made
They do things differently than you would
They solve problems their way, not yours
They change processes you created
They tell you when you're wrong
Can you handle that?
Most business owners can't. They want control more than they want growth. So they hire "managers" and turn them into over-titled assistants.
If you're not ready to let go, don't hire a manager. Hire help. Just call it what it is.

You can't hire "a manager." That's not a role. That's a title corporations throw around to make people feel important.
What are they managing? What's their area of responsibility?
Operations Manager: Owns how work gets done. Process, efficiency, delivery, quality.
Sales Manager: Owns revenue. Pipeline, leads, conversions, client acquisition.
Client Success Manager: Owns retention. Client satisfaction, renewals, upsells, churn prevention.
Project Manager: Owns execution. Timelines, budgets, delivery, client communication.
Team Manager: Owns people. Performance, development, conflicts, productivity.
These are completely different skill sets. Completely different personalities. Completely different outcomes.
You can't hire "a manager" any more than you can hire "an employee." Be specific.
What part of your business needs ownership? That's the role.
Here's the difference between hiring an assistant and hiring a manager.
Assistants get tasks:
Answer customer emails
Update the CRM
Schedule meetings
Process invoices
Post on social media
You tell them what to do and how to do it. They execute. That's the job.
Managers get areas of responsibility:
Own client satisfaction
Own sales pipeline
Own operational efficiency
Own team performance
Own delivery quality
They figure out HOW to achieve the outcome. You measure whether they did.
If you're hiring a "manager" but handing them a task list, you're hiring wrong.
Managers don't need tasks. They need problems to solve and the authority to solve them.
If your "manager" needs approval for every decision, can't change processes, can't make judgment calls, and can't solve problems without asking permission—you didn't hire a manager.
You hired an assistant with an inflated title and resentment building.

Real managers need:
Decision-making authority within their area (spend up to $X, approve up to Y, change processes that aren't working)
Budget control (if they're responsible for outcomes, they need resources to achieve them)
Process ownership (if something's broken, they can fix it without a committee meeting)
Problem-solving power (they solve, then inform—not ask, then wait)
If you're not willing to give them that, don't hire a manager. Hire a senior assistant and save yourself the salary difference.
Most businesses aren't.
You can't hand someone chaos and expect them to manage it. That's not management. That's crisis response.

Before you hire a manager, you need:
Documented processes. If everything lives in your head, your manager can't manage it. They can only guess what you want and wait for direction.
Write down how things work. Even badly. Even if it's just bullet points. Give them something to manage.
Clear roles and responsibilities. Who does what? Who owns what? If the answer is "we all just kind of do everything," you're not ready.
Define roles. Even if it's just you and two other people. Clarity scales. Ambiguity collapses.
Metrics that matter. How do you know if things are going well? Revenue? Client satisfaction? Project delivery? Error rate?
If you can't measure it, you can't manage it. And neither can they.
Systems they can actually manage. A CRM. A project management tool. A communication platform. Something other than "we talk about it when issues come up."
Managers manage systems. If you don't have systems, there's nothing to manage.
Willingness to let go. This is the one that kills most first management hires.
You say you're ready. You're not. You'll hover. Override. Micromanage. Undermine.
If you're not actually ready to let someone else make decisions, don't waste their time or your money.
Your first manager isn't your forever manager. They're your chaos-to-systems manager.
You're not hiring someone to manage a well-oiled machine. You're hiring someone to build the machine while keeping the business running.
That requires specific skills.
They need to be a builder, not just an operator. You don't need someone who's managed established teams at established companies with established processes.
You need someone who can create a process where there is none. Document what's in people's heads. Build systems from scratch.
Former consultants. Former project managers. People who've scaled small businesses before. That's your pool.
They need to handle ambiguity. Everything is not going to be clear. Priorities will shift. Resources will be limited. They'll have to figure it out.
If they need clarity, structure, and stability to function, they'll drown. And so will you.
They need to communicate up. Your first manager isn't just managing down. They're managing you.
They need to tell you when you're the problem. When you're slowing things down. When your decisions are inconsistent. When you're undermining their authority.
If they can't have those conversations, they can't manage.
They need to be a generalist, not a specialist. Your first manager will wear multiple hats. Operations + people + process + some client work. That's the reality of small business.
Specialists are expensive and narrow. Generalists are adaptable. You need adaptable.
They don't need to be like you. In fact, they shouldn't be.
You're probably a visionary, risk-taker, idea generator. Great. You don't need another one of those.
You need someone who executes. Who finishes. Who thinks about implementation, not just ideas.
Hire your opposite. That's how you cover your gaps.
You're going to want to skip steps. Don't.
Step One: Define the area of responsibility.
Not tasks. Not "help me with stuff." The specific area they will own.
"You own client satisfaction. Measured by retention rate, NPS score, and client feedback. You have authority to change processes, reallocate resources, and make decisions up to $5K to improve those metrics. I measure outcomes, you figure out how."
That's clear. That's manageable. That's a real role.
Step Two: Document what you know.
Before they start, brain dump everything. How things work. Where things are. Who does what. What's broken. What's working.
It doesn't need to be pretty. It needs to exist.
This is their baseline. They'll improve it. But they need something to start with.
Step Three: Set clear success metrics.
What does success look like at 30, 60, 90 days?
Not "they're doing great." Measurable outcomes.
30 days: They understand the business, documented 3 key processes, identified top 3 operational problems.
60 days: Implemented solutions for 2 of 3 problems, measurable improvement in [specific metric].
90 days: Fully autonomous in their area, metrics improving, team running smoother.
Write it down. Review it together. Adjust as needed.
Step Four: Give them real authority.
Tell the team this person has decision-making power. Then back them up when they use it.
If you override them in front of the team, you just killed their authority. Now they're a messenger, not a manager.
If they make a call you wouldn't have made, let it play out unless it's catastrophic. They'll learn. You'll learn. The team will learn they actually report to this person, not just you through this person.
Step Five: Get out of the way.
This is the hardest part. You will want to jump in. Fix things. Take over.
Don't.
Set up a weekly check-in. They update you. You ask questions. You give feedback. Then you leave them to execute.
If you can't do this, you're not ready to hire a manager.
Answer these honestly.
If no, you're not ready.
If no, you're not ready.
If no, you're not ready.
If no, you're not ready.
If no, you're not ready.
If you answered no to any of these, don't hire a manager yet. Build systems first. Document processes. Get comfortable with delegation at a smaller scale.
Hire an assistant. Delegate tasks. Practice letting go.
Then, when you're actually ready to give someone an area of responsibility and the authority to own it, hire a manager.

You'll hire someone good. Pay them well. Give them a nice title.
Then you'll:
Undermine their decisions
Change priorities without telling them
Go around them to "fix" things
Micromanage their work.
Override their calls in front of the team
Get frustrated they're not "taking initiative"
They'll quit. Or worse, they'll stay and become a well-paid order-taker who's given up trying to actually manage.
You'll blame them. "Management didn't work out." "They weren't the right fit." "I guess I'm just better off doing it myself."
Wrong.
They weren't the problem. Your inability to let go was the problem.
The Bottom Line
Hiring your first manager is less about finding the right person and more about whether you're the right owner to have a manager.
Can you delegate an entire area of responsibility? Can you give real authority? Can you get out of the way? Can you handle them doing things differently than you?
If yes, then define the area they'll own, document what you know, set clear metrics, give them real power, and let them manage.
If no, don't hire a manager. Build systems. Hire task-based help. Work on your control issues.
Then, when you're ready to actually let someone manage, hire them.
Because a manager with no authority isn't a manager. They're an expensive placeholder for your inability to let go.
Fix that first.
Then hire.
Your final destination for ditching the overwhelm and stress of running a business.
Get The BRIEF
Smart plays - straight to your Inbox!