Here's how it goes:
You're slammed. Behind on everything. Working till midnight. Client work is suffering. Your inbox is a war zone. You think: "I need help. Yesterday."
So you panic-post a job listing between meetings. You need someone who can do everything you do, costs half what you're worth, and starts Monday.
Spoiler: That person doesn't exist.
But you don't know that yet. You're too busy drowning to notice you're fishing in an imaginary pond.
“I can’t find qualified people.”
“No one wants to work anymore.”
“My team can’t do it as well as I can.”
This isn’t a talent shortage—it’s a hiring timing and process problem.
You can't afford to hire until you're desperate. Can't afford not to hire once you're desperate. So you wait. And wait. Until one Tuesday you realize you're six weeks behind, missed a deadline, and your best client is getting twitchy.
Now you're hiring from crisis mode. Which means you're hiring badly.
Why Crisis Hiring Fails
Waiting too long to hire means you’re always desperate
Job descriptions become wish lists for unicorns
Onboarding and training are skipped or rushed
New hires are set up for failure, not success
You write a job description that's actually three jobs. You interview while distracted. You skip the reference checks because "we need someone NOW." You hire the first person who seems competent and available.
Then reality hits.
They need training. (You don't have time to train them.) They need systems. (You don't have systems.) They need clear direction. (You're still drowning, remember?)
Three months in, they're underperforming. You're frustrated. They're confused. You're both disappointed.
Your conclusion: "I can't find qualified people."
Wrong conclusion. You found someone. You just set them up to fail.
Credentials vs. capacity: you’re screening for the wrong things
Qualified people avoid chaotic, crisis-mode companies
“Qualified” isn’t “identical”—it’s adaptable, resourceful, and able to learn
Everyone talks about the "widening skills gap." How industries are evolving. How education can't keep up. How automation is changing everything.
All true. None of it is your actual problem.
Your problem is simpler: You're hiring for a fantasy role while offering real-world chaos.
That job posting asking for "5+ years experience, expert-level skills, startup energy, corporate polish, mind-reading abilities"? You're not describing a qualified candidate. You're describing a unicorn. And you're offering unicorns Shetland pony wages.
The qualified people exist. They're just not applying to your posting. Because your posting signals exactly what you are: desperate, disorganized, and about to be a nightmare to work for.

You're screening for credentials. Degrees. Years of experience. Specific software skills. The perfect resume.
Meanwhile, the person who could actually solve your problems is getting filtered out because they learned on the job instead of in a classroom. Or switched careers. Or took an unconventional path.
You're not looking for qualified. You're looking for identical. Someone who's already done this exact job at a company exactly like yours.
That's not hiring. That's cloning. And it doesn't work.
The person you need can think, adapt, and learn. They can spot a problem and fix it without needing their hand held. They can work in ambiguity because, newsflash, your small business is ambiguous.
But you'll never find them if you're using a rigid checklist written by someone (you) who was too fried to think clearly.
Let's be honest about what you actually need:
Someone who can figure shit out. Someone who doesn't need perfect conditions to do good work. Someone who can build the plane while flying it.
But your job description doesn't say that. It says "dynamic team environment" (translation: chaos), "wear many hats" (translation: no clear role), "fast-paced" (translation: we have no processes).
Qualified candidates read that and run. They've seen this movie. They know how it ends.
You're attracting people who don't know better. Then you're surprised when they can't handle it.

No time to train or onboard
Sink-or-swim culture
Failure is engineered by the environment, not the hire
You hired someone. Now they need training. But you don't have time to train them. You barely have time to breathe.
So you throw them in the deep end. Sink or swim. And when they start thrashing, you think: "Not qualified."
But here's the thing: No one is qualified for chaos. Competent people need context, clarity, and structure. Without it, they fail. Then you blame them for the failure you engineered.
This isn't a talent shortage. This is you expecting someone to succeed in conditions where you're barely surviving.
You waited too long to hire. You hired in crisis mode. You had unrealistic expectations. You had no onboarding plan. You had no time to manage them. No systems for them to follow. No clear success metrics.
Then you acted surprised when it didn't work.
The talent is out there. Plenty of it. Smart, capable, adaptable people who could help you scale. But they need something from you first:
A hiring process that isn't chaos. A role that's actually buildable. Realistic expectations. And at least a fighting chance to succeed.
Hire before you're desperate - even if it feels risky. Can't afford it? You can't afford not to. The cost of hiring from crisis is higher than the cost of hiring proactively. Do the math.
Write honest, realistic job descriptions. Not a wish list. A real role. With real expectations. Be honest about the chaos level. The right person won't be scared off. The wrong person will self-select out. That's good.
Focus on capacity and adaptability, not just credentials. Can they think? Can they learn? Can they operate in ambiguity? That matters more than whether they have 5 years doing this exact thing.
Build the minimum viable onboarding process. Not perfect. Not comprehensive. But something. A checklist. A first-week plan. Thirty minutes of your time to set them up properly pays back in days saved later.
Hire for the business you're building, not today’s crisis. If you're always hiring for right now, you're always behind. Hire someone who can grow into the role you'll need six months from now.
The Bottom Line
You don't have a talent problem. You have a timing problem, an expectations problem, and a process problem.
Stop blaming the talent pool. Start fixing your approach.
The qualified people are out there. They're just not interested in joining your dumpster fire.
Make it less of a dumpster fire. Watch what happens.
Are you ready to stop hiring from crisis and build a REAL TEAM?
Your final destination for ditching the overwhelm and stress of running a business.
Get The BRIEF
Smart plays - straight to your Inbox!